Skip to content

Selected work

Selected project experience across research, policy, programs and evaluation. These examples show different questions, methods and outputs—not a single service package.

Policy and governance · knowledge sharing

Bridging Knowledge Systems (Peace-Athabasca Delta)

Client: Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)

A framework and practical tools for ethical knowledge sharing, Indigenous intellectual property protection and collaboration among Indigenous communities, government and researchers.

Details
Stakeholder engagement · knowledge use

Knowledge Use in Salmon Conservation & Management

Client: Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) — Pacific Salmon

A stakeholder-informed study of how knowledge supports salmon conservation and management decisions, using workshops and causal modelling to compare perspectives and identify leverage points.

Details
Policy implementation · evaluation planning

Model Scientific Integrity Policy (mSIP): Theory of Change & Performance Indicators

Client: Office of the Chief Science Advisor (Canada)

A theory of change and candidate indicators to support implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the Model Policy on Scientific Integrity.

Details
Featured Case Study

ASEAN Environment System Map (ASPEN) — Research translated into practical pathways

Client: The Asia Foundation (ASEAN)

A regional evidence base brought together to examine environmental priorities, connections and questions for validation.

System map developed for the ASPEN project

The question

  • How can a broad regional evidence base inform environmental priorities and coordination?
  • 700+ sources spanning environment and connected domains.
Pathway card example from the ASPEN project

The outputs

  • An evidence-backed system map
  • A portfolio of priority pathways and supporting analysis
  • Briefing-ready material and questions for further validation

The analysis

  • Organized evidence into relationships that could be traced back to sources
  • Combined machine-assisted processing with human review
  • Examined pathways, dependencies, risks and trade-offs

Why it is useful

The example shows how a complex evidence base can be organized into an analytical output that supports discussion of priorities, while making the underlying reasoning and remaining questions visible.

Get in Touch

Tell us what you are working on and where independent research or advice could help.

PolicySpark works directly with organizations and alongside consulting teams on suitable assignments.